<?xml version="1.0"?>
<frameset>
<predicate lemma="disagree">
<note>
Frames file for 'disagree' based on sentences in financial subcorpus
and automatic expansion via verbnet.
</note>

<roleset id="disagree.01" name="disagree" vncls="36.1">
<roles>
	<role descr="first arguer" n="0">
		
  <vnrole vncls="36.1" vntheta="Actor1"/></role>
 
	<role descr="second arguer" n="1">
		
  <vnrole vncls="36.1" vntheta="Actor2"/></role>
 
	<role descr="topic" n="2">
		
  <vnrole vncls="36.1" vntheta="Topic"/></role>
 
</roles>

<example name="intransitive">
<inflection aspect="perfect" form="full" person="third" tense="ns" voice="active"/>
<text>
    Mr. Icahn advocates the sale of the company's steel operations,
    and Mr. Corry doesn't necessarily disagree. 
</text>
        <arg n="0">Mr. Corry</arg>
        <arg f="NEG" n="M">n't</arg>
        <arg f="ADV" n="M">necessarily</arg>
        <rel>disagree</rel>
</example>

<example name="topic as sentence">
<inflection aspect="ns" form="full" person="ns" tense="ns" voice="ns"/>
<text>
    Thomas M. Bloch, president and chief operating officer, says ``I
    would disagree'' that the tax business is mature. 
</text>
        <arg n="0">I</arg>
        <arg f="MOD" n="M">would</arg>
        <rel>disagree</rel>
        <arg n="2">the tax business is mature</arg>
</example>

<example name="topic as nominal">
<inflection aspect="ns" form="full" person="ns" tense="past" voice="active"/>
<text>
    The appeals court disagreed on both counts.
</text>
        <arg n="0">The appeals court</arg>
        <rel>disagreed</rel>
        <arg f="on" n="2">both counts</arg>
</example>

<example name="introduced by different preposition">
<inflection aspect="ns" form="full" person="third" tense="present" voice="active"/>
<text>
    A spokesman for Dow Jones said he hadn't seen the group's filing,
    but added, ``obviously Dow Jones disagrees with their
    conclusions. 
</text>
        <arg f="DIS" n="M">obviously</arg>
        <arg n="0">Dow Jones</arg>
        <rel>disagrees</rel>
        <arg f="with" n="2">their conclusions</arg>
</example>

<example name="merged arguers" src="argue.02">
  <text>
    John and Mary disagreed about the cause of his noxious foot odor.
  </text>
  <arg n="0">John and Mary</arg>
  <rel>disagreed</rel>
  <arg f="about" n="2">the cause of his noxious foot odor</arg>
</example>

<example name="I can't believe this hasn't occurred yet" src="argue.02">
  <text>
    John disagreed with Mary about the cause of his noxious foot odor.
  </text>
  <arg n="0">John</arg>
  <rel>disagreed</rel>
  <arg f="with" n="1">Mary</arg>
  <arg f="about" n="2">the cause of his noxious foot odor</arg>
</example>

</roleset>
</predicate>
</frameset>
