<?xml version="1.0"?>
<frameset>
<predicate lemma="recreate">
<note>
  Frames file for 'recreate' based on transformation of 'create' frames.
  No actual examples examined.  For additional examples of the
  higher-numbered arguments consult the frames files for those verbs.
</note>

<roleset id="recreate.01" name="recreate" vncls="26.4">
<roles>
  <role descr="recreator" n="0">
		
  <vnrole vncls="26.4" vntheta="Agent"/></role>

  <role descr="thing recreated" n="1">
		
		
  <vnrole vncls="26.4" vntheta="Product"/><vnrole vncls="27" vntheta="Theme2"/></role>

  <role descr="source" n="2">
		
		
  <vnrole vncls="26.4" vntheta="Material"/><vnrole vncls="27" vntheta="Theme1"/></role>

  <role descr="benefactive" n="3">
		
  <vnrole vncls="26.4" vntheta="Beneficiary"/></role>

  <role descr="attribute, secondary predication" n="4"/>
</roles>

<example name="cause to come about">
  <text>
  It's precisely the kind of product that *trace*'s recreated the
  municipal landfill monster.
  </text>
  <arg n="0">*trace*=that=the kind</arg>
  <rel>recreated</rel>
  <arg n="1">the municipal landfill monster.</arg>
</example>

<note>
Yes, I know, semantically the trace should point to "product" not
"kind", but syntactically it has to point to "kind", and since
Treebank totally mucked up the syntax for all these kinds of
constructions, we have to follow what they did.
</note>

</roleset>
</predicate>
</frameset>
